28/03/2021
In an unexpected and increasingly common development, taxis are stepping into a vital role within the UK's emergency healthcare system. Faced with unprecedented pressures, ambulance services across England, Scotland, and Wales are now regularly dispatching private hire vehicles to transport patients who have called 999 or 111. While the National Health Service (NHS) assures the public this measure is only taken when it is clinically safe and appropriate, figures reveal a significant increase in this practice, sparking both relief and concern among patients and professionals alike. This evolving landscape of emergency transport highlights the immense strain on frontline services and raises pertinent questions about the future of urgent care provision.

The scale of this shift is considerable. Between April 2021 and the end of January 2022, over 24,000 journeys were made where a taxi was sent following a 999 or 111 call across England, Scotland, and Wales. This represents a more than 23% increase compared to the previous year, according to figures obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests. This growing reliance on private transport underscores the persistent challenges faced by ambulance trusts in meeting demand, leading them to explore alternative solutions to ensure patients reach hospital for assessment and treatment, even if not by a traditional ambulance.
- The Rising Trend of Taxi Dispatches
- Regional Usage and Last Resorts
- Addressing Pressure on Emergency Services
- Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
- Why are taxis being used instead of ambulances for 999 calls?
- Is it safe to be transported by taxi after a 999 call?
- Which types of emergency calls result in a taxi dispatch?
- Do patients have a say in being transported by taxi?
- What are the concerns raised about this practice?
- How can I ensure I use 999 appropriately?
The Rising Trend of Taxi Dispatches
The figures paint a clear picture of a system adapting under duress. The significant jump in taxi dispatches signals that this is not an isolated occurrence but a burgeoning trend. Ambulance services are increasingly turning to taxis as a pragmatic solution to alleviate backlogs and ensure patients, even those with urgent but not immediately life-threatening conditions, can access hospital care without prolonged waits. This strategy, while controversial to some, is framed by the NHS as a necessary measure to manage resources effectively, allowing emergency ambulances to prioritise the most critical, life-threatening calls.
Patients conveyed by taxi have varied widely in age and condition, from a three-day-old baby in Yorkshire to a 103-year-old in Wales, illustrating the broad spectrum of scenarios where this method is employed. Despite these numbers, the NHS maintains that these taxi journeys account for a tiny proportion—just 0.3%—of total ambulance call-outs during the period analysed. However, even a small percentage of millions of calls translates to thousands of individuals experiencing a non-traditional emergency transport method.
When Are Taxis Used? Categorisation and Clinical Safety
A crucial aspect of this practice is the rigorous assessment process that determines when a taxi is deemed appropriate. The NHS spokesperson emphasised that taxis are only used to transport patients when it is clinically appropriate and with the patient consent. This means that a comprehensive evaluation by a clinician, often a paramedic either on scene or via phone triage, must conclude that the patient's condition allows for safe transport by a standard vehicle without immediate medical support en route.
Emergency calls are categorised to prioritise response. Category 1 (C1) cases, defined as "immediate, life-threatening" situations, are strictly reserved for emergency ambulances. No C1 patients are conveyed by taxi. For Category 2 (C2) cases, which involve serious conditions like a stroke, paramedics will first assess the patient on scene. If, following this in-person assessment, the incident can be safely downgraded, a taxi may then be called. The majority of taxi dispatches appear to fall under Category 3 (C3) calls, which require urgent transport but are often triaged by phone before a taxi is booked. In Scotland and Wales, equivalent categorisations such as 'amber' calls (serious but not immediately life-threatening) are also seeing increased taxi usage.
Patient Experiences: A Glimpse into the Reality
For patients, the experience of being sent a taxi instead of an ambulance can be startling. Andrew Weeds, a 73-year-old from Norwich, recounted his shock after developing excruciating stomach pain, believing he had appendicitis. His wife dialled 999, only to be informed that an ambulance could take up to 15 hours. A paramedic on the line then decided he needed to get to hospital and arranged a taxi. Mr Weeds, who was in severe pain and vomiting, admitted he was "gobsmacked" by the situation. Despite his initial surprise and discomfort, he acknowledged his relief when the taxi arrived, getting him to A&E where he was eventually diagnosed with an infection after a seven-hour wait.
The East of England Ambulance Service (EEAST) apologised to Mr Weeds for the wait but clarified that his call was initially graded as Category 5 (not urgent) before being upgraded to C4 (less urgent but requiring hospital investigation). This case highlights the dynamic nature of call categorisation and the difficult decisions clinicians face in allocating scarce resources. The EEAST, like other services, has "long-standing arrangements with taxi firms and third-party providers to support our services."
The Perspective of Taxi Drivers
While this system provides a lifeline for patients and a means of managing ambulance pressures, it also places taxi drivers in an unforeseen and potentially uncomfortable position. A manager at a taxi firm used by EEAST voiced significant concerns, stating that asking drivers to respond to 999-related calls was "unacceptable." The core of his concern lies with the drivers' lack of appropriate training for such situations.
Taxi drivers are self-employed and typically only trained to drive a vehicle. They lack first aid training or emergency medical treatment qualifications. "He's probably not even be aware of what he was getting involved in at that particular time," the manager stated, highlighting the ethical dilemma and potential risks for both driver and patient should a medical emergency arise during transit. Ambulance trusts, however, reiterate that an ambulance is always sent if there is any question about the suitability of using a taxi, implying that the patient's condition is stable enough not to require immediate medical intervention during the journey.
Regional Usage and Last Resorts
Data from the 10 ambulance trusts in England, Scotland, and Wales that provided figures show varying levels of taxi utilisation. The North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) emerged as the heaviest user, dispatching taxis for over 11,000 C2 and C3 occasions between April 2021 and January 2022. NWAS confirmed that all C1 and C2 patients initially receive an ambulance, and C3 patients are offered a phone or face-to-face consultation to determine the most appropriate response, including a taxi, only with the patient's consent and if deemed safe by a clinician.
The Welsh Ambulance Service (WAST) was the second-highest user, with 5,398 patients transported by taxi under amber calls in the financial year to January 2022. Lee Brooks, WAST executive director of operations, reiterated that taxis are used only "when a clinician has assessed the patient first and determined it safe and clinically appropriate to do so." He firmly stated that a taxi will never be the first resource on scene for a life-threatening 'red' call, even for very young or elderly patients who have been triaged face-to-face by clinicians and deemed safe to travel by alternative means.

The consensus among ambulance services is that using taxis is a "last resort," a necessary evil in the face of overwhelming demand. As one paramedic, who assesses patients over the phone, anonymously put it: "We fully understand that a 10-minute taxi is better than waiting 10 hours for an ambulance. We just pray that we don't miss something during the phone conversation with the patient." This sentiment encapsulates the difficult balancing act between patient safety, timely access to care, and the finite nature of emergency resources.
Addressing Pressure on Emergency Services
The increased reliance on taxis for emergency calls is a symptom of broader systemic pressure on the UK's emergency services. This pressure is not exclusive to ambulance trusts; police forces also face challenges with non-emergency calls tying up vital 999 lines. Assistant Chief Constable Scott Young of Northumbria Police noted a "real shift in our 999 demand" since the relaxation of coronavirus regulations, with people calling about non-crime related issues and "public safety issues where people are in a crisis."
Examples include individuals calling 999 because they've lost their keys and can't get into their house, or seeking general advice that could easily be found online. This misuse of the 999 service diverts crucial resources and call handler time away from genuine emergencies, exacerbating the strain on the entire emergency response infrastructure. Both police and ambulance services urge the public to use 999 for genuine emergencies only and to consider alternatives like 111 online, local pharmacies, or police websites for non-urgent matters. This responsible use of emergency services is critical to ensure that those in immediate need receive the rapid response they require, helping to alleviate the pressures that lead to innovative, yet sometimes contentious, solutions like taxi dispatches.
| Region/Type | Number of Journeys | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| England, Scotland & Wales (Total) | >24,000 | >23% increase from previous year |
| North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) | >11,000 | For C2 and C3 calls |
| Welsh Ambulance Service (WAST) | 5,398 | For 'amber' calls |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Why are taxis being used instead of ambulances for 999 calls?
Taxis are being used due to significant ambulance pressures and high demand on emergency services. They are dispatched for patients whose conditions are assessed by a clinician as urgent but not immediately life-threatening, allowing emergency ambulances to remain available for critical Category 1 cases.
Is it safe to be transported by taxi after a 999 call?
The NHS states that taxis are only used when it is clinically appropriate and safe to do so. A clinician, often a paramedic, assesses the patient first to ensure their condition is stable enough for transport without medical intervention during the journey. However, taxi drivers are not medically trained, which is a point of concern for some.
Which types of emergency calls result in a taxi dispatch?
Taxis are never used for Category 1 (life-threatening) calls. They may be used for Category 2 (serious) calls after an on-scene paramedic assessment downgrades the incident, or more commonly for Category 3 (urgent transport) calls, which are often triaged by phone before a taxi is booked.
Do patients have a say in being transported by taxi?
Yes, ambulance services confirm that patient consent is always obtained before a taxi is arranged for transport to hospital. If a patient is unwilling or unable to consent, or if there's any doubt about suitability, an ambulance will be dispatched.
What are the concerns raised about this practice?
Concerns include the lack of medical training for taxi drivers, which could be an issue if a patient's condition deteriorates en route. There are also ethical considerations about the standard of care provided when a traditional ambulance is not available. However, for many patients, a taxi is preferable to a prolonged wait for an ambulance.
How can I ensure I use 999 appropriately?
Only dial 999 for genuine life-threatening emergencies or serious crimes. For other health concerns, use NHS 111 online or by phone, visit a local pharmacy, or consult your GP. For non-emergency police matters, use their online services or 101. Responsible use of emergency numbers helps ensure that vital emergency care resources are available for those who need them most.
The increasing integration of taxis into the emergency response framework is a stark indicator of the immense strain on the UK's healthcare system. While presented as a pragmatic solution to manage demand and ensure patients receive timely access to hospital care, it also sparks important debates about the implications for patient safety, professional responsibilities, and the overarching strategy for resource allocation in a perpetually stretched NHS. As this practice continues to evolve, ongoing scrutiny and adaptation will be crucial to ensure it serves the best interests of both patients and the dedicated professionals working to keep the nation safe and healthy.
If you want to read more articles similar to When Cabs Become Ambulances: UK Emergency Shift, you can visit the Taxis category.
